Mecca Mosque Case Blows Up On Proof

HYDERABAD: Eleven years of protracted investigations by way of two premier businesses and Hyderabad police fell flat on Monday after the special NIA courtroom threw out the case, bringing up no proof. So why was there no clincher to nail the accused?

Witnesses produced by way of the prosecution and the testimony of key accused Aseemanand and his retraction later spelt doom for the Mecca Masjid blast case, most sensible investigation officials advised TOI. Of 226 witnesses cited by way of NIA to prove its case, handiest 66 have been crucial whose statements have been capable of showing serious relating the result of the case. All final witnesses have been both docs, who carried out the autopsy on deceased in the blasts and police firing, or investigation officials who did the panchnama.
However, even these 66 witnesses grew to become opposed and rendered NIA helpless. Majority of them belonged to Jharkhand and MP from where some accused hailed from. Added to key witnesses turning opposed was the confession fiasco of Swamy Aseemanand, key accused in the case. Aseemanand deposed ahead of a Delhi Justice of the Peace in 2010 mentioning he performed the blast as he was upset over assaults on temples that targeted Hindus. Also, he advised the Justice of the Peace that because the Nizam of Hyderabad opted to merge with Pakistan all through independence, he chose Hyderabad as the objective to punish the city for siding with Pakistan. Aseemanand’s remark was recorded under Section 164 of CrPC by way of Delhi pass judgement on.

However, in 2011, Aseemanand wrote to a Hyderabad courtroom pass judgement on retracting the remark he made ahead of the Delhi pass judgement on. “I made the remark confessing to my involvement in the Mecca Masjid Blast owing to pressure from CBI,” he said. Sources advised TOI, the NIA pass judgement on who delivered the decision on Monday, totally dismissed the remark made by way of Aseemanand ahead of the Delhi pass judgement on. “This, coupled with witnesses turning opposed, led to the prosecution’s case collapsing like a pack of cards,” they said.

There have been different problems too that contributed to the failure of the prosecution, which relied at the remark of an alleged prison mate of Aseemanand, who claimed the latter confided in him in regards to the conspiracy in the back of the Mecca Masjid blast. But NIA may just not even display proof that this witness was in prison together with Aseemanand. Likewise, NIA claimed they recovered the key to the field used to cause the Mecca Masjid Blast from one Tejaram, but forensic exam established the key didn't belong to the field related to the blast.

Similarly, SIM cards meant to be used as blast triggers in Mecca Masjid have been related to at least one Babulal Yadav as they have been discovered to be bought on with his title. But NIA may just not hyperlink this Babulal to any of the accused in the case. This came about despite the fact that Babulal’s title figured in the Ajmer blasts case too. In 2017, a Jaipur courtroom acquitted Swamy Aseemandand and 6 others in the Ajmer blasts case. And on Monday, all of the accused in the Mecca Masjid blast case too have been acquitted.
Mecca Mosque Case Blows Up On Proof Mecca Mosque Case Blows Up On Proof Reviewed by kailash soni on April 17, 2018 Rating: 5
Powered by Blogger.